DISCLAIMER
Read this
before you deposit
Depositing is not the safe option and it is not passive income. It is a bet on trading volume, and it can leave you worse off than doing nothing.
Reserving a runner
There is no mint program yet. Reserving pays SOL to the project treasury now, and the runner is minted to your address — and the pool seeded — afterwards, by hand.
Nothing on-chain obliges that to happen. You are trusting the operator to deliver, and there is no contract, escrow or refund mechanism enforcing it.
Pay only from a wallet you control. A withdrawal sent from an exchange arrives from a custodial address that is not yours, and there is nowhere to deliver an NFT to — those funds are effectively lost.
The payment carries an on-chain memo identifying it as a reservation. Keep your transaction signature; it is the record of what you paid and when, and the ordering that decides which price tier you were in.
Price tiers step up as runners are reserved. If several reservations land close together, the tier is settled by transaction order.
A bet on volume, not on price
Deposit your entitlement and you later withdraw roughly half in ZUKIN and half in SOL, plus whatever trading fees accrued — minus impermanent loss, and minus the price impact of your own sell leg.
If ZUKIN's price rises, simply holding beats depositing. That is what providing liquidity is; it is not a flaw in this design.
Impermanent loss
When you hold two assets in an automated market maker, the pool sells whichever one is rising and buys whichever is falling. Come back after a large move and you hold less of the winner than if you had sat still. The fees you earn have to out-earn that gap for depositing to have been worth it. There is no guarantee they will.
Every deposit sells
Half of every entitlement routed into the vault is swapped to SOL on the way in. That is a real sell into a real pool, and it moves the price. The program refuses any deposit whose fill would land further below the pool mid than a configured limit — but the limit bounds a single deposit, not the aggregate.
Across the whole collection the effect compounds: each deposit adds ZUKIN to the pool and no additional SOL, so the price walks down as deposits accumulate. How far depends on the total entitlement against the pool's depth. The simulator on the home page shows this directly.
What this is not
Not staking. Not dividends. Not revenue share. Not yield from holding a token. No return is promised, projected, or guaranteed. Nothing here is an offer to sell a security, and nothing here is financial advice.
Current state
There is no $ZUKIN token. No mint exists on Solana or anywhere else. Any address presented as $ZUKIN is not ours — do not buy it.
The mint is not open and nothing can be minted today. A separate Zukin collection exists on Robinhood Chain; it is a different collection on a different chain, and this vault is in addition to it, replacing nothing.
The program is not deployed to any public cluster, and no ZUKIN/SOL pool exists. The Raydium integration is written and has been run end to end against a real pool cloned from mainnet, but that is a test on a local machine — not a live product you can deposit into.
Figures shown on the home page for reserves, prices, LP balances and accrued fees are simulated inputs you are moving, not measurements. The arithmetic behind them is the program's own and is verified against it; the pool it describes does not exist yet.
Do your own research
Smart contracts can contain defects, including this one. Audits reduce risk but do not remove it. Assume anything you deposit can be lost, and deposit nothing you cannot afford to lose.